Response to the Response of Simon

This article responded to the artists aesthitics and motivations behind the piece. It speaks about the interactivity of the piece and the ability to end up on alternate paths, much the same as in my response to Simons piece. The article seemed to imply that this was the first to do that, but in our first class we learned of all the hyper-linking that was done long ago. Simons is a good piece, but not ground breaking.